Perera v. De Groot, 2007 BCCA 242 (CanLII)
This was David McWhinnie’s first appearance in the Court of Appeal. The appellant marine surveyors successfully appealed from a finding of professional negligence.
This was David McWhinnie’s first appearance in the Court of Appeal. The appellant marine surveyors successfully appealed from a finding of professional negligence.
This was my first civil trial. The plaintiff was compensated for the negligence of an employee of the defendant in obtaining financial information from the plaintiff.
Blair Curtis successfully represented Mr. Parks, who was terminated when he refused to accept a new position with the employer. The employer took the position that his refusal amounted to him quitting, but the Court ruled in favor of our client and awarded him severance.
In this case, Blair Curtis was counsel for Ms. Orlando, who was awarded the maximum notice period allowed by law. This case is frequently cited for the judge’s commentary in the decision that people dismissed over the age of 50 should receive longer notice periods (higher severance) on the basis that it will be more difficult for them to find new employment.
David McWhinnie’s first appearance in Supreme Court as an Articled Student. The hearing addressed whether a Police Board owed a private law duty of care to provide proper policing services in dealing with mentally ill persons.
Blair Curtis was co-counsel on this trial on behalf of Mr. Cardiff, who received severance with a value exceeding $1,300,000.00.
Blair Curtis was co-counsel on this case on behalf of Mr. Martell. The employer’s allegations of “cause” were rejected, and Mr. Martell was awarded (after an appeal) more than $445,000.00 in severance plus the considerable value of stock options that the former employer tried to deny him.
Blair Curtis was co-counsel on this appeal, which involved a contractual interpretation dispute. Acting for the former employer, Blair Curtis succeeded in resisting the plaintiff’s claim to an additional payment of $400,000.00 after termination.
Blair Curtis was co-counsel on this trial, which involved a contractual interpretation dispute. Acting for the former employer, Blair Curtis succeeded in resisting the plaintiff’s claim to an additional payment of $400,000.00 after termination.
Blair Curtis was co-counsel on this trial, in which a former employee made a claim against Blair’s client for an alleged bonus owed. Acting for the former employer, Blair Curtis succeeded in defending against this claim. The Court found there was no merit in the bonus claim.
I recently had the opportunity to deal with David McWhinnie at Tevlin Gleadle Curtis Employment Law Strategies.
David was extremely prompt, courteous and truly went out of his way to assist with my case. His sincerity and genuineness came across in a very heartfelt and humane manner - as though he was coming from a place of "seva" (self-less service without regard to profit).
I highly recommend Tevlin Gleadle Curtis Employment Law Strategies for Clients seeking assistance in Employment matters.